Cases 1 - 10 of 5,904
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Defendant:
Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Canales
Defendant:
Senior Warden Phonso J. Rayford, Correctional Officer Vanessa Valero, Correctional Officer Ruth Trice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
Jasper Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Telford Unit
as 3:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Everist Davis
Defendant:
Telford Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Vedal A Davis
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Anthony Newton and Gynna Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv01048
Petitioner:
Jim Wesley Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Darryl Glenn Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
