Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Thomas v. Cheetwood et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Thomas
Defendant:
Richard Cheetwood, William Calcutt, Matthew Medert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv02601
Petitioner:
Clifford Deangelo Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bates v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Bates
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Judge Raquel Pope and Sheriff Lablat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04461
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clark, Leroy Rogers, DeAngelo Cook and others
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Sutton Richardson, Stephen Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIER v. ALLEN, et al.
as 7:2019cv00156
Defendant:
LIBRARIAN ADRIAN NELSON, MARTY ALLEN, STAN SHEPARD and others
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN DEANGELO GRIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Correct Health Provider of Chatham County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAngelo Hodges
Defendant:
Correct Health Provider of Chatham County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Correct Health Provider et al
as 4:2019cv00098
Defendant:
Correct Health Provider, Mr. Crowder and Chatham County Sheriff Office
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAngelo Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01789
Petitioner:
Qadir Shabazz, Deangelo Moore and Deangelo Muhammad
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GRIER v. DEAL
as 5:2019cv00117
Respondent:
JAMES DEAL
Petitioner:
LASHAWN DEANGELO GRIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremiah v. Allen et al
as 6:2018cv00106
Defendant:
Lt. Folk, Sgt Mike, Warden Adam and others
Plaintiff:
Ponder Jeremiah and Jeremiah Deangelo Ponder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
