Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Scott v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv02579
Plaintiff: Larry S. Scott
Defendant: Fuentes and Deangelo Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snodey et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv10094
Plaintiff: William Gene Snodey
Defendant: R Valadez, Tom Dart, CCDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. USA
as 2:2023cv02189
Petitioner: Deangelo Terrell Banks
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hampton v. Collins et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff: Deangelo Hampton
Defendant: Daniel A. Collins and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bragan
as 1:2022cv01382
Petitioner: Marcus Deangelo Jones
Respondent: D Bragan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff: Marcus Deangelo Jones
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons and M Stegal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv03224
Petitioner: Deangelo Christensen
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bivens v. Carother et al
as 4:2019cv04073
Defendant: Lt. Ford and Lt. . Carother
Plaintiff: DeAngelo Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Taylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff: Deangelo Owens
Defendant: Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivens v. Shuffler et al
as 3:2019cv03088
Defendant: Zoller, Watson, Settles and others
Respondent: Lieutenant Shuffler, C/O Hamilton, Officer Eager and others
Plaintiff: DeAngelo Bivens and DeAngelo C Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?