Cases 1 - 10 of 241
TOUCHTON v. PADGETT et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TOUCHTON
Defendant:
DEAN PADGETT and RICKY MAZINGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. DEAN
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
URSULA DEAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean, Ivan Charles v. Sherea Green
as 1:2024cv20712
Plaintiff:
Ivan Charles Dean
Defendant:
Sherea Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean, Ivan v. Mrs. Green et al
as 1:2024cv20208
Plaintiff:
Ivan Charles Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Green, Ms. McMullen, J. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, TOMMY FORD, BAY COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Murzike v. Gosnell et al
as 3:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. M. Gosnell, V. Hazel, Sergeant Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lamb et al
as 3:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Corian Jones
Defendant:
T. Lamb, D. Allen, K. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14137
Plaintiff:
Toby Dean Chapman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagler v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Cody Dean Hagler
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
