Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Oriakhi v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 1:2023cv05569
Petitioner:
Daniel Oriakhi
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01783
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gabriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2021cv00200
Defendant:
Megan Foote Monsky, Chad Wolf, ICE and others
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golding v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06998
Plaintiff:
Karim Golding
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Giron v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv06995
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Dianne Witte and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Giron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Clervrain v. Cissna et al
as 1:2020cv02197
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, United Nations (U.N.) and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07503
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
