Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC) Dicks v. Moseley et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Eric Dicks
Defendant:
H. Moseley, S. Gates, Melinda Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tauno A. Koivisto v. Gill et al
as 2:2020cv03837
Respondent:
James Hills, Teddey, Scott Bruse Jenner and others
Petitioner:
Tauno A. Koivisto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koivisto v. Gill et al
as 3:2020cv02710
Defendant:
Teddey, Zack, Dick Richard Jenumues and others
Plaintiff:
Tauno A. Koivisto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis III v. Gibson et al
as 1:2018cv00610
Plaintiff:
Relmon H. Davis, III
Defendant:
J. Vanderpool, Corcoran State Prison Trust Office, F Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sessoms v. Keller et al
as 2:2016cv01943
Plaintiff:
Tio Dinero Sessoms
Defendant:
John Patrick Keller, Dick Woods, Heather Fargo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dicks v. Witte
as 3:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Dicks
Defendant:
R. L. Witte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Warrior v. California Republic Fort Dick et al
as 4:2014cv04792
Petitioner:
Marvellous Amir Warrior
Respondent:
California Republic Fort Dick, Cresent City and Pelican Bay State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Verduzco v. Gipson et al
as 1:2014cv01083
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Verduzco
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, T. Perez, D. Goree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2013cv04969
Plaintiff:
Shannon White and Charlie Lee Million
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., J. D. Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. The White House, et al.
as 1:2010cv02315
Plaintiff:
Kane Campbell
Defendant:
The White House, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
