Cases 1 - 10 of 68
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dicks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Union)
as 3:2024cv00377
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Dicks
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DAWSON et al
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
VJ DAWSON, OFFICER L JACKSON, T SMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moretto v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
Stephen Andrew Moretto
Defendant:
M. Wilson, R. Solorzano, D. Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole et al v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole, Jamar Cole, Markesa Mitchell and others
Defendant:
State of Florida, City of Jacksonville, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dicks v. Fipps
as 3:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Dicks
Respondent:
DEPUTY Robert Fipps and Robert Fipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKS v. FIPPS
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MICHAEL DICKS
Defendant:
DEPUTY ROBERT FIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Troy Wagner
Defendant:
Kanisha Peterson, Dakota Cardenas, Mark Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE 1 DOE, JANE 2 DOE, JANE 3 DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
