Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAYSE v. WARD et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN AMANDA BAYSE and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Dr. Sharon Lewis, JAVEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOWLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, DEPUTY WARDEN MEADOR, NURSE PRACTITIONER ND LOMAMI and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WATSON, NURSE PRACTITIONER LOMAMI, DEPUTY WARDEN MEADOR and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Ms. [FNU] Mosely, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Mr. [FNU] Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Sprayberry et al
as 1:2019cv03437
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, Warden Kevin Sprayberry, Dr. Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Marlin Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, Warden Kevin Sprayberry, Dr. Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Marlin Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Smith et al
as 4:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Ms. Adkins, Dr. Sharon Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Q. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lewis et al
as 6:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, Dr Yarborough, Nurse Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
