Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Deana Lunsford and Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Joshua Hyman, Cody Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Jacobson, et. al.
as 5:2019cv00259
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Interested Party:
United States of America
Jackson v. Ravitz et al
as 5:2019cv00173
Respondent:
Drew Edmondson, Robert A Ravitz and District Attorney
Petitioner:
Centerdor M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bates v. USA
as 6:2016cv00498
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Drew Samuel Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCleary v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2014cv00754
Petitioner:
Angelo McCleary
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Slover v. Edmon et al
as 5:2014cv00451
Petitioner:
Johnny Allen Slover
Respondent:
Drew Edmon and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drew v. Tunica County Circuit Court, Tunica, Mississippi
as 4:2013cv00227
Petitioner:
William E Drew
Respondent:
Tunica County Circuit Court, Tunica, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Banks v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center, Pam Butler, Drew Scarsborough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Berryhill v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv01495
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randy Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
