Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Fernando Carlos Lopez v. E. Guzman et al
as 5:2023cv01456
Petitioner:
Fernando Carlos Lopez
Respondent:
E. Guzman and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ferguson v. Sherman et al
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
S. Sherman, E. Guzman, J. Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everton Whitely v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv02216
Defendant:
F. Villalobos, H. Tillman, E. Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
Everton Whitely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lovell v. Wakabayashi et al
as 2:2019cv01555
Defendant:
Claudine, J Greiner, E. Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lovell, III and David Anthony Lovell, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ybarra v. Vega et al
as 1:2017cv06725
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Ybarra
Defendant:
A Vega, E Guzman, John Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Guzman v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 15-12241
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE E. GUZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Guzman-Fernandez v. USA
as 3:2015cv01529
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Oscar E. Guzman-Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Guzman v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2014cv80242
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Guzman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray Medina v. B. Morris, et al
as 13-55617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
B. MORRIS, Facility Captain at RJD, D. K. MCBRIDE, Associate Warden of RJD, P. A. CORTEZ, Correctional Counselor at RJD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
