Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
George Ferra, Glynn County Detention Center and Sheriff E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Major George Ferra, Sheriff E. Neal Jump and Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Moss et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Byron Donnelle Clay
Defendant:
Captain Moss, Colonel Young, Sheriff E. Neal Jump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Byron Donnelle Clay
Defendant:
M. Morales, Sheriff E. Neal Jump and Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramsey v. Jump et al
as 2:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
Lewis Wendell Ramsey, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Jeff Gunderson, Dr Kicbler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Jump et al
as 2:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brooks
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Jeff Gunderson, Dr. Kidder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckerd v. Gunderson et al
as 2:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd and Drew
Defendant:
Jeff Gunderson and E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Jump et al
as 2:2020cv00068
Defendant:
FNU Keen, E. Neal Jump, FNU Bacon and others
Plaintiff:
Westley Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
