Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Miller v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv01803
Plaintiff:
Rickie A. Miller
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Det. Anne McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharif v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department, City of Eugene, Officer Ryan Trullinger and others
Plaintiff:
Muhsin Sharif
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Dylan Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Officer Jon Doe 1, Officer Jon Doe 4, Officer Jon Doe 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Eugene Police Department
as 6:2020cv01299
Plaintiff:
Rickie Miller
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv01867
Defendant:
Patricia Perlow, City of Eugene, Patty Perlow and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Atril Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hejazi v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv01553
Defendant:
Lane County, Ellen Rosenblum, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv00790
Plaintiff:
Antonio G. Ortiz
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Sean Dillon, Michael Brelsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv00572
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department, City of Eugene and Lt. S. McGann
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garry v. Eugene Police Department
as 6:2017cv01572
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department
Plaintiff:
Gerome H. Garry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Oregon Department of Correction et al
as 6:2016cv01299
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department, Robbie Manders, Oregon Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Antron Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
