Cases 1 - 10 of 476
Woods
as 3:2024cv06332
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gray v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2024cv02401
Defendant:
M. Muslim, S. McCambridge, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gay v. Dodd et al
as 5:2024cv05235
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Gay
Defendant:
Attorney Andrew Love, CAP Agency, Attorney Lynne S. Coffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Johnson v. California Superior Court
as 2:2024cv02145
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
California Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Earl Gay v. Sheriff of Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2024cv05719
Defendant:
Deputy No. 2, Deputy No. 1, Sheriff of Los Angeles County and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stephens v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2024cv01785
Defendant:
A. Espinoza, J. Schultz, M. Nunez and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Earl Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stephens v. Felder
as 2:2024cv01713
Defendant:
M. Felder
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Earl Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Drake v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00651
Defendant:
T. Campbell
Plaintiff:
Earl David Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. USA (2255- 2:13-cr-0399 MCE CKD)
as 2:2024cv01048
Petitioner:
Jesse Earl Davenport
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Glinton v. City of Santa Clara County et al
as 3:2024cv01715
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Earl Glinton
Defendant:
City of Santa Clara County and Elmwood Men Facility Santa Clara County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
