Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Easley v. Pike County Mississippi et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
Pike County Mississippi, Pike County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff James Brumfield and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Young
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
Warden Herbert Young
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Easley v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Herbert Young, Richard Bynam and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Smith
as 3:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Easley
Defendant:
P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Perry et al
as 3:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nicholas O'Donnell, II
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, L. Easley and R. Abangan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Easley
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center, Butch Howard, Billy Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. King et al
as 3:2009cv00132
Petitioner:
Darrell Dewayne Easley
Respondent:
Ron King and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easley v. King et al
as 2:2009cv00229
Petitioner:
Darrell Dewayne Easley
Defendant:
Ron King and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easley v. Leake County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Willie Easley
Defendant:
Leake County, Mississippi, Greg Waggoner, Warden Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
