Cases 1 - 9 of 9
King v. St. Clair County et al
as 3:2021cv00387
Defendant:
East St. Louis Police Department, St. Clair County, St. Clair County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Edward King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. East St. Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00736
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Mitchell
Defendant:
East St. Louis Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon v. East St. Louis Police Department
as 3:2019cv00379
Defendant:
East St. Louis Police Department, Richard Sharp, Juan McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shannon and Branden Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillum v. Baxton et al
as 3:2012cv00626
Plaintiff:
Cortez D Gillum
Defendant:
Michael Baxton, Jr, Michael Floore, Alvin Parks, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Richardson, Jr. v. Ronald Matthews, et al
as 09-3622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT L. RICHARDSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD MATTHEWS, Chief of Police, East St. Louis Police Department, RICKY PERRY, AYOUB QATTOUM, Auxiliary East St. Louis Police Officer also known as DAVE QATTOUM and others
Nelson v. Henson et al
as 3:2009cv00361
Plaintiff:
James C. Nelson
Defendant:
Andre Henson, Patrick Henson and East St. Louis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taylor v. East St. Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv00839
Plaintiff:
Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
East St. Louis Police Department and Robert E McCullum
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hampton v. St. Clair County Jail et al
as 3:2008cv00389
Plaintiff:
Pernell L Hampton
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Nursing Staff, East St. Louis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Staten v. Officer et al
as 3:2007cv00570
Plaintiff:
James E. Staten
Defendant:
Officer and East St Louis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
