Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Santos v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Martha Rojo, Julie Radostitz and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Rigoberto Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv01967
Defendant:
Officer Brian Wade, Lieutenant Eddie Bance, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lucero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01813
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santos v. State of Oregon
as 3:2020cv01374
Petitioner:
Eddie Rigoberto Santos
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Snider et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jason Duchek, Sue Washburn, Sargent Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Esteban Vallejo, Bobby Swearingen, Casey Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. FNU Conley et al
as 2:2019cv00709
Defendant:
FNU Patton, FNU Eyon, FNU Conley and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2019cv00441
Defendant:
Brady, D. Pedro, Heather Nevil and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jason Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv01217
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Two Rivers Corrections Facility Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Inc., Bill Brady and Eddie Climmer
Plaintiff:
Lowell Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Whelan et al
as 2:2016cv01929
Defendant:
C. Conley, J. Dafoe, C. Dieter and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
