Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JOHNSON v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
ELBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARBER et al v. JUSTICE et al
as 4:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
LARRY BARBER, MATTHEW LEVI FAISON and ELBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
ODELL JUSTICE, JANET YELLEN, SARAH L KULL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Petitioner:
Rahim Fahim Abdullah and Ozzie Elbert
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elbert v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2021cv02935
Petitioner:
Richard H. Elbert, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. INCH
as 5:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
ELBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdullah v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01161
Petitioner:
Rahim Fahim Abdullah and Ozzie Elbert
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. LUMPKINS et al
as 1:2020cv21979
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ANGELA F. LAWRENCE, UNIT OFFICER FRADE, UNIT OFFICER DELMAN LUMPKINS and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Elbert Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. LUMPKINS et al
as 1:2020cv21978
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ANGELA F. LAWRENCE, UNIT OFFICER FRADE, UNIT OFFICER DELMAN LUMPKINS and others
Plaintiff:
MIKE ELBERT NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kang et al
as 1:2015cv22185
Plaintiff:
Elbert Johnson
Defendant:
Y. Kang and T. Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA
as 8:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Elbert Lester Williams
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
