Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jaime Elizondo
Defendant:
State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 7:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jaime Elizondo
Defendant:
State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Jaime Elizondo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant II v. Officer Elizondo et al
as 9:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bryant II
Defendant:
Officer Elizondo, Officer Jones, Officer Hallmark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downum v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Downum
Defendant:
Richard Kirkpatrick, Chief Deputy Jamie Garza, Asst. Chief Deputy Kohl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Elizondo v. Warden - FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
Pablo Lopez Elizondo
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FMC Ft Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Courtois v. Lt. Elizondo et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Courtois
Defendant:
Lt. Elizondo, Sgt. Ramos and Medical Personal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Payne v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00938
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jarvis Payne
Defendant:
State of Texas, BCADC, Pre-Trial Bond Officer 1 [43820], in and for the State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. USA
as 4:2020cv00081
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Elizondo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Elizondo v. United States of America
as 7:2019cv00425
Petitioner:
Oscar Elizondo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
