Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Morgan v. Cash et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Derrick Morgan
Defendant:
Lisa F Cash, Dietary Supervisor Ester, Dietary Supervisor Ren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Mendricks et al
as 1:2021cv02645
Defendant:
Commander Contwell, Sgt Allen, Sgt. Richard and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv09264
Plaintiff:
Lee Ester Davis
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Correctional Officer Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caruth v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06621
Plaintiff:
James Caruth
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, S.A. Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Schwarz et al
as 1:2013cv04672
Plaintiff:
James E Hampton
Defendant:
Dianna Schwarz, Dr. Aguinaldo, Ester Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Cation et al
as 3:2013cv03171
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Cornille
Defendant:
Richard Cation, Ester Martin, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Tilden et al
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lacey James
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Alton Angus, Jose Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor, Jr. v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv07386
Plaintiff:
John E Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Kevin C. Halloran, Allan Karraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Ester et al
as 1:2010cv01212
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Martin Ester, Marvin Reed and Guy D Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Mahone et al
as 1:2010cv01207
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Slyvia Mahone, H Hamilton, Doug Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
