Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Arguijo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Fabian Arguijo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Officer A. Codero et al
as 1:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Sherman Wilson
Defendant:
Police Officer A. Codero, Police Officer Fabian, Police Officer Kazam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arguijo v. John Doe
as 4:2023cv03751
Plaintiff:
Fabian Arguijo
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arguijo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Fabian Arguijo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arguijo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00468
Petitioner:
Fabian Arguijo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arguijo v. Inmate Trust Fund
as 1:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Fabian Arguijo
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Fabian Garcia Ramos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Juarez v. Courtroom 399 et al
as 5:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Fabian Juarez
Defendant:
Courtroom 399, DAs in 399, Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Boyd et al
as 5:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin, III
Defendant:
Roger Boyd, Major FNU Herrera and Fabian Sierra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Fabian Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department, Midland Police Department, Matthew Sedillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
