Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Williams-Bey v. Wichita, City of et al
as 5:2023cv03130
Petitioner:
Kirk Franklin Williams-Bey and Kirk F. Williams
Respondent:
Wichita, City of, Mark Orr, Armand L. Shukaev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Larned State Hospital
as 5:2022cv03206
Petitioner:
Kirk Franklin Williams and Kirk Franklin Williams-Bey
Respondent:
Larned State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Salina Municipal Court et al
as 5:2022cv03097
Plaintiff:
Kirk Franklin Williams and Brother Kirk Williams-Bey
Defendant:
Salina Municipal Court and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2020cv03307
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Petitioner:
Maurice Franklin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. USA
as 6:2020cv01251
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maurice Franklin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Belles v. Lasswell et al
as 5:2020cv03167
Defendant:
Kyle Lasswell and Franklin County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Belles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham (ID 86780) v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv03042
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Curtis Hall
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Cunningham, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv03030
Defendant:
Brandon Barkley, Matthew Zwiefle, Clay Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Cunningham, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penland v. Franklin County Detention Center
as 5:2018cv03176
Defendant:
Franklin County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Michael Penland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belles v. Franklin County Adult Detention Center et al
as 5:2017cv03036
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Belles
Respondent:
Franklin County Adult Detention Center and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
