Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Nieves v. Barker et al
as 9:2024cv00983
Defendant:
C.O. Bass, C.O. O'Brien, C.O. Loci and others
Plaintiff:
Elvin B. Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. Hurd et al
as 9:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredericks and Nigel Fredricks
Defendant:
Daniel J. Stewards and David N. Hurd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. May et al
as 6:2024cv06436
Defendant:
C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Defendant:
John Doe Correction Officer and C. May
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03977
Defendant:
Dylan Buschinski and City Of New York
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Uhler
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Marquise Frederick
Defendant:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gross
Defendant:
James C Johnson and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05787
Plaintiff:
Frederick Walker
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, John Doe Agents of New York City, John Doe Agents of New York State at Downstate Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
