Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SLATON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT DIVISION, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
as 2:2023cv00501
Petitioner:
DANEE SLATON
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT DIVISION, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JAMES v. FAMILY COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
DURON JAMES
Respondent:
FAMILY COURT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES MARINES et al
as 2:2022cv04541
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED RASHON DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARINES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE DEPARTMENT, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT et al
as 2:2012cv03423
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT, ANGELES ROCA, ELIZABETH JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOOM v. BARRETT et al
as 2:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
JASON M. BLOOM
Defendant:
STEPHEN BARRETT, MONTGOMERY COUNTY FAMILY COURT, NEIL STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARLOW et al v. MILGRAM et al
as 2:2009cv02541
Petitioner:
CLINTON C. BARLOW and KAREN E. BARLOW
Respondent:
ANNE MILGRAM, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATKINS v. PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT
as 2:2008cv01004
Petitioner:
DONALD WATKINS
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LUMUMBA v. FAMILY COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2007cv04123
Petitioner:
ALI A. LUMUMBA
Respondent:
FAMILY COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
