Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02072
Petitioner:
Melvin Hudson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr.
as 24-5043
Petitioner:
RICKEY BENSON
Respondent:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Sheriff
Mason v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Devonte D. Mason
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Office, Chief Burnett, Captain Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02356
Plaintiff:
Loyd Wayne Foster
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Shelby County Sheriffs Jail Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nisbett v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nerven Nisbett
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioner, Chief Kirk Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Bonner
as 2:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
Tracy Parker
Defendant:
Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02193
Plaintiff:
Nicole Freeman
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Applon v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02178
Plaintiff:
Myiesha Applon
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Officer Alamin, Officer Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
