Cases 1 - 10 of 415
PEGUERO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07080
Petitioner:
JOSE MATOS PEGUERO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTINEZ POLANCO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2024cv07005
Petitioner:
HILARIO MARTINEZ-POLANCO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AKINMADEYEMI v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07003
Petitioner:
AKINTOLA AKINMADEYEMI
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DE LIMA v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06925
Petitioner:
PEDRO VICIOSO DE LIMA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ESPANARUIZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06930
Petitioner:
JHON JAIRO ESPANARUIZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERRI v. WARDEN OF F.C.I. FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06767
Petitioner:
BRIAN A. PERRI
Respondent:
WARDEN OF F.C.I. FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Vincent Pisciotta v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 24-1986
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PISCIOTTA
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06498
Petitioner:
SATURNINO DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OLUWADAMILARE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06201
Petitioner:
ADELKE B. OLUWADAMILARE
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
