Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Bonilla v. Freeman
as 4:2024cv06333
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman
as 4:2024cv05991
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Beth Labson Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Presley et al
as 5:2024cv03905
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, M. Botello, D. Metcalf and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03533
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Freeman v. Dudley et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Kyle Freeman and Kyle Alexander Freeman
Defendant:
Dudley, R. Singh, E. Tardd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Macias et al
as 4:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Avaro Covarrubias Perez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Macias, Correctional Officer L.Lopez, C. Koening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03010
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv02741
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01206
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford v. Lt. B. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv08471
Petitioner:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Respondent:
B Perez, J Coleman, B Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
