Cases 1 - 10 of 504
KING v. HARDDEN et al
as 1:2024cv05442
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL KING
Defendant:
REV. P. HARDDEN, SGT. E. HEADLEY and KESHIA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. CALDWELL et al
as 1:2023cv03460
Plaintiff:
GARY L. WILSON
Defendant:
EUGENE CALDWELL, II and NURSE ANGIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv01350
Petitioner:
GARY BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLAYLOCK v. LUKE et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
PRENTISS J. BLAYLOCK
Defendant:
OFFICER CURRAN LUKE, OFFICER ROBERT P. SHEPPARD, OFFICER NATHAN LAHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANSEVERO v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2022cv01977
Plaintiff:
DANE SANSEVERO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MR. BRIAN HUGHES, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCHVILLE v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
EDWARD VICTOR FRANCHVILLE, JR
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, VICTORIA WELLS-MANLANDRO, WARDEN DONALD LOMBARDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SARBOUKH v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2022cv01622
Plaintiff:
J. SARBOUKH
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY, GURBIR GREWAL, CAROL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv20233
Plaintiff:
PEDRO DEJESUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2021cv20121
Plaintiff:
GARY NELSON
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv19403
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
