Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Usoh v. Geo Groups et al
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sunday Quincy Usoh
Defendant:
Geo Groups, Warden Michael Breckon, Lt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04897
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Merrick Garland and US Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. GEO GROUP INC RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC RIVERBEND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wearing v. Robert A. Deyton Detention et al
as 1:2022cv03497
Plaintiff:
Rashad Andre Wearing
Defendant:
Robert A. Deyton Detention, GEO Group Incorporated, Warden Charles Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. The Geo Group Inc.
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manuel Prado Hernandez
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Geo Secure Services et al
as 1:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
Arthur Antonio Johnson
Defendant:
Geo Secure Services, D. Bryne, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility (GEO)
as 1:2021cv05075
Plaintiff:
Jerry Joseph Jordan
Defendant:
Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility (GEO)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility
as 1:2021cv04984
Defendant:
Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility and GEO
Plaintiff:
Jerry Joseph Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAYLOR v. REEVES et al
as 5:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
DERRICK P TAYLOR
Defendant:
WARDEN ANGELA REEVES and GEO CORPORATION GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banda v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Alick Ricky Banda
Defendant:
Randy Davis, D. Horton, Chief of Security H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
