Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Gov. Glenn Youngkin et al
as 1:2023cv01861
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Jose Quiroz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv01748
Petitioner:
Glenn Joseph Raynor
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Schultz et al
as 1:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Schultz and Warden Debra Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Weber et al
as 1:2022cv02172
Plaintiff:
Floyd Glenn Williams
Defendant:
Warden R. S. Weber, Dr. Matthew Alaway, Dr. Jason Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Darden et al
as 1:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Warden Debra Darden, Lt. Milbourne, Lt. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2021cv03003
Plaintiff:
Glenn Davis
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Wolfe, Former Warden Cleveland Friday and Former Chief Antonette Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Parsons v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv01253
Defendant:
Acting Warden R. Shane Weber, C.O. II B. Wilburn, C.O. II E. Layton and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Glenn Parsons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Collins v. Maynard
as 1:2021cv00199
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Holly Hoover and Glenn Hoover
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Collins
Interested Party:
Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brooks v. USA 2255
as 1:2020cv01850
Petitioner:
Glenn Brooks
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
