Cases 1 - 10 of 1,493
Don Lippert, et al v. Quentin Tanner, et al
as 24-1998
Plaintiff:
DON LIPPERT, WILLIAM E. BASSETT, MILAM MARTIN and others
Defendant:
QUENTIN TANNER, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Godinez v. CDCR Custody Staff et al
as 3:2023cv02040
Plaintiff:
Rafael Godinez
Defendant:
CDCR Custody Staff and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palacios v. Lewis et al
as 3:2023cv01822
Plaintiff:
Aaron Marcel Palacios
Defendant:
Lewis, Godinez and C.D.C.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Neill v. Godinez et al
as 5:2023cv03149
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Sarah Godinez and Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foust v. Godinez et al
as 3:2023cv03557
Plaintiff:
Carl Foust
Defendant:
Sgt. Godinez, M. Strange and I. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sydney Cooper v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 23-55549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYDNEY COOPER, AKA Sidney Cooper
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Former, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Current, D. MCGUIRE, Litigation Coordinator and others
Godinez v. USA
as 1:2023cv04418
Plaintiff:
Adan Godinez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Palacios v. Lewis et al
as 3:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Aaron Marcel Palacios
Defendant:
Lewis, Godinez and C.D.C.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Palacios v. Lewis et al
as 3:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Aaron Marcel Palacios
Defendant:
Lewis, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and Godinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
