Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Stewart II v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert E Stewart II
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith, Quality Correctional Care and Thomas Lehman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartole v. Goldsmith
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Bartole
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartole v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 2:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Bartole
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County, Bob Goldsmith, Sarah Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDSMITH v. TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 2:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
KEYLYNN LANDON GOLDSMITH
Defendant:
TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pruitt v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Erwin Jay Pruitt
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith, Tom Lehman and Cody Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Goldsmith et al
as 3:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
David Lee Mobley
Defendant:
Robert A Goldsmith, Thomas Lehman and Kari Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Lee Mobley
Defendant:
Robert A Goldsmith, Thomas Lehman and Kari Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Tippecanoe County Jail Administration et al
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Tracy Regan Hopkins
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Jail Administration, Robert Goldsmith, Tom Lehmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Quality Correctional Care et al
as 4:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Robert Stewart
Defendant:
Dr Elrod, Bob Goldsmith and Quality Correctional Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
