Cases 1 - 10 of 29
IN RE: KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY
as 2:2024cv02102
Petitioner:
KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY and DR. EUGUNE DONALD GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Stephen White
Defendant:
Superintendent Laurel Harry, Philip Jedrzejek, Bill Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gabriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Megan Foote Monsky, Chad Wolf, ICE and others
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Quay
as 1:2021cv00135
Respondent:
Warden Quay
Petitioner:
Joal William Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodwin v. Quay
as 1:2020cv00610
Respondent:
Warden Quay
Petitioner:
Joal William Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodwin v. Hawk-Sawyer et al
as 1:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Darrin Howard, DHO Bittenbender, Warden H Quay and others
Plaintiff:
Joal William Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beatty v. Harry et al
as 4:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Rodney N. Beatty
Defendant:
Rodney Carberry, Laurel Harry, DOC Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI BEY v. MCCUTCHEON et al
as 2:2019cv00531
Petitioner:
KOKAYAI BARUTI ALI BEY and EUGENE GOODWIN
Respondent:
EDNA MCCUTCHEON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LARRY KRASNER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOODWIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv05269
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ridge v. Giglio et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Luther T. Ridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael A. Giglio, Larry R. Snyder, Jorge E. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
