Cases 1 - 10 of 700
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jay Harrison and Gregory Harrison
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Tammy Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fusilier v. Singletary et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gregory Fusilier
Defendant:
James P Singletary, Roy West, Zena Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Other:
Gregory M Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Resendez v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Angel Eduardo Resendez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Brandon Gregory Renden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kenney and Gregory Benedict
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Gregory Zachary Monroe
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monroe v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Gregory Zachary Monroe
Respondent:
Warden and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
