Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HARRIS v. FL DOC et al
as 4:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Defendant:
FL DOC, FL STATE PRISON, FREDERICKA ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2022cv21501
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Regional Counsel, Lorenzo Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01178
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Florida State Prison, Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 4:2020cv00343
Defendant:
WARDEN DON DAVIS, MARK INCH, LPN HANKEASON and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2020cv21750
Defendant:
State of Florida
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2020cv00095
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
GREGORY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2019cv24989
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2019cv01375
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Gregory Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00339
Defendant:
DANYELES, C BROWN, MARK INCH and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
