Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Grooms v. Bartlett et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Gregory Howard and Gregory Howard Grooms
Defendant:
J Bartlett, A Rutledge and Beaumont TX Medical Staff ECT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grooms v. USA
as 4:2016cv00592
Petitioner:
Tippany Denae Grooms
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beasley et al v. Office of Violent Sex Offender Management et al
as 4:2013cv01392
Plaintiff:
William Beasley, Charles Wilson, James Atkins and others
Defendant:
Office of Violent Sex Offender Management , Allison Taylor , Lisa Worry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West v. Fort Worth Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mekos West
Defendant:
Fort Worth Police Department, NFN Trull and Amie Grooms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley et al v. Office of Violent Sex Offender Management et al
as 1:2012cv01165
Plaintiff:
Arturo Abella, Abel Adame, James Atkins and others
Defendant:
Program Specialist Billy Barnes, Dr. Nicholas Edd, Program Specialist Alice Jauregui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandoval v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv02122
Plaintiff:
Catarino Sandoval
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Brad Livingston, Ben Raimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Clark et al
as 4:2010cv01624
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Mullins
Defendant:
Jonathan Clark, Jody Vincent, Thomas Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grooms v. USA
as 4:2010cv00267
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tippany Denae Grooms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Hunt et al
as 4:2010cv00676
Plaintiff:
Taurus Brown
Defendant:
Thomas Hunt, Thomas Hutt, Robert Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coats v. Livingston et al
as 4:2010cv00226
Plaintiff:
Rodney Coats
Defendant:
Robert Grooms and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
