Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Hatcher v. State of TN et al
as 3:2024cv00583
Petitioner: Henry Roosevelt Hatcher, III and Hank Gunther
Respondent: State of TN, Metro and Emma l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hatcher v. Lamiman et al
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff: Charles J Hatcher
Defendant: Austin Lamiman, - Evans, Mike Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00264
Defendant: Kilgore, Ken Miller, James Mosley and others
Plaintiff: Larry T Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00037
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Quinton DeWitt Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Trader v. CO. Hatcher et al
as 2:2018cv00132
Plaintiff: Paul D. Trader
Defendant: FNP, Hatcher and Sullivan County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Light et al
as 2:2017cv00215
Plaintiff: Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant: Gordon Light
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. McCready et al
as 2:2017cv00216
Plaintiff: Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant: Amy McCready
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Knox County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2017cv00293
Plaintiff: Daniel Lynn Williams
Defendant: Knox County Detention Facility, Guard Harvey and Guard Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00203
Plaintiff: Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Tennessee Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00202
Plaintiff: Shamsiddeen Hatcher
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?