Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Chapman v. Barron et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Roslyn Demetriu Chapman
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and LoAnne Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bennett v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
Howard Bennett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegge v. Inslee et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hegge and Alvin L Hegge
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Todd Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolford v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01689
Petitioner:
Audrey Jean Wolford
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hazen v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01636
Petitioner:
Jamez C Hazen
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tapia v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Petitioner:
Jasmin Jetta Tapia
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lei v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Wobiao Lei
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmitt v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Jacob Ivan Schmitt
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
