Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lamonte, Jr. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr. and Al-Kareem-Khalil
Defendant:
Special Agent Matthew Pierce, G.D.C. Criminal Investigation Division, G.D.C. Office of Professional Standards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Dept. of Human Services/Chatham County Child Support Srvc.
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
Dept. of Human Services/Chatham County Child Support Srvc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boston v. Georgia Department of Human Services
as 1:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Boston
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00345
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Session v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03789
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Session
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Division of Child Support Services, Georgia Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. C.D.C. et al
as 1:2012cv01812
Plaintiff:
Kent A. Easley
Defendant:
C.D.C., Department of Health and Human Services and Katherine Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neville v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv02688
Plaintiff:
Turnbull Neville, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Clayton County, Ashley Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggs v. Brown et al
as 1:2011cv02570
Petitioner:
Victor Laval Biggs
Respondent:
Brown, Dept. of Human Resources and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
