Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Patterson v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02709
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Patterson
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Mark Lutrell, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2017cv02649
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratcher v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2017cv02648
Plaintiff:
Warren Pratcher
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nipper v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 2:2017cv02651
Plaintiff:
James Nipper
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frith v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2017cv02652
Plaintiff:
Ricky Frith
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02292
Plaintiff:
Robert Burnett
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv02568
Plaintiff:
Stephan Richardson
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Shelby County, Amy Weirich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sappington et al v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2016cv02203
Plaintiff:
William Sappington, Warren Pratcher, Marcus Williams and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff's Dept., Bill Oldham, Sandlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Oldham et al
as 2:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
Micah Andrew Wood
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center and Hammons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sappington v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02830
Plaintiff:
William Carl Sappington
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Down Town Bail Bonding, Kate Edmands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
