Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HARGROVE et al v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al.
as 2:2021cv04082
Plaintiff:
RODNEY HARGROVE and CINDY HARGROVE
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGROVE v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2020cv06584
Respondent:
JUDGE SUSAN IRIS SCHULMAN, JUDGE ZACHARY C SHAFFER, JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND HARGROVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARGROVE v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2020cv00610
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MS. COOK and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HARGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 3:2017cv00108
Petitioner:
Raymond Hargrove
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board and Attorney General Of The State Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARGROVE v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv00112
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD HARGROVE
Respondent:
CYNTHIA LINK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hargrove v. Parole Board et al
as 3:2016cv01413
Petitioner:
Raymond Hargrove
Respondent:
Parole Board and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hargrove v. Wertz et al
as 3:2015cv00954
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hargrove
Defendant:
Randy Wertz, Jerry Everhart and Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Hargrove
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGROVE v. C.F.C.F.
as 2:2010cv05839
Plaintiff:
RAY HARGROVE
Defendant:
C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
