Cases 1 - 10 of 22
LEWIS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
STEPHANIE THOMPSON and RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRIELL v. FISHER et al
as 1:2023cv21983
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN D. HARRIELL
Defendant:
KEISHA FISHER, OFFICER HARRISON and OFFICER GROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv14602
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH REEVES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, ANGELO ONOFRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON et al v. MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2020cv20713
Defendant:
NEAL HAMILTON, MAUREEN MILLER, DELORRES MANN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON, DEBORAH JONES-WASHINGTON, MICHAEL WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2020cv02778
Plaintiff:
LEWIS
Defendant:
ORTIZ
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDREWS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2019cv21277
Defendant:
ASST. ADMIN. AMY EMRICH, APN. INAISH JACKSON, INV. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv04296
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HARRISON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JAY MILLER, DEBRA SPOTTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED
as 1:2016cv08111
Plaintiff:
KIESHA HARRISON
Defendant:
NO DEFENDANT LISTED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2016cv06521
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HARRISON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALLAGHER v. KARAS et al
as 2:2013cv05751
Plaintiff:
DANA JOHN GALLAGHER
Defendant:
COREY KARAS, JOHN T. OSTERKORN, E. MCNAMARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
