Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hayslette v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv15442
Petitioner:
William Hayslette
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Hayslett v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02535
Petitioner:
Jason Hayslett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Aramark et al
as 2:2023cv02020
Plaintiff:
Marlo S. Watkins
Defendant:
Aramark, Shirley Hayslett and F/N/U Kesha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Aramark et al
as 2:2017cv02183
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Nash
Defendant:
Aramark, Shirley Hayslett, Shelby County Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Aramark et al
as 3:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Nash
Defendant:
Aramark, Shirley Hayslett, Shelby County Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Moore et al
as 2:2016cv02922
Plaintiff:
James E. Morris
Defendant:
Robert Moore, Shirley Hayslett and Armark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 2:2015cv02824
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquette Myers
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services and Shirley Hayslett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 2:2015cv02714
Plaintiff:
Johnny Rowland
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services and Hayslett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton Simpson v. Phil Bredesen, et al
as 15-6154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON LEON SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BREDESEN, former Tennessee Governor, WILLIAM OLDHAM, "Bill"-Shelby County Sheriff, ROBERT MOORE, Chief of Jail Operations and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
