Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Jaime Antonio Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lagunas Hernandez v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
Julia Lagunas Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez-Zavala v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
Alejandra Hernandez-Zavala and Alejandra Castillo-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. Janssen Pharmaceutical
as 4:2021cv00240
Plaintiff:
Darius James Hernandez
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00346
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Yoandri Michel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brothern v. Thompson et al
as 6:2019cv02073
Defendant:
Mark Herbst, Kevin Hernandez, Black Hawk County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brothern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brothern v. Thompson et al
as 4:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Mark Herbst, Kevin Hernandez, Black Hawk County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brothern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 6:2019cv02005
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alvaro Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Guerrero Hernandez v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00354
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Francisco Guerrero Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brothern v. Black Hawk County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv03022
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brothern
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Jail, Anthony Thompson, Mark Herbst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
