Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Lynch, William v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lynch
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Probation Officer Amanda Kinnyon and Tiffany Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Borgen et al
as 2:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Desmond Hicks
Defendant:
James Borgen, Tyler Broderick, Kelly Schoebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steinke v. Witt et al
as 2:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Amber Aguilera, John Doe CO's, Cathryn Tyce and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J Steinke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles et al v. Champagne et al
as 2:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Shirley Berger, Captain David Hicks, Dr Eugene P Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Dolgner, Devon Shumpert, Antonio McCarroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles, Nicasio et al v. Champagne, Quala et al
as 3:2020cv01128
Defendant:
David Hicks, Dr. Eugene P. Burke, Maria Silao-Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Dolgner, Devon Shumpert, Antonio McCarroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00885
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Perry Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hicks v. Lucas
as 2:2020cv00725
Petitioner:
Calvin Jesse Hicks
Respondent:
Earnell R Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Lannoye et al
as 2:2020cv00505
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and Sgt Lannoye
Plaintiff:
Mickale Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks, Mickale v. Radtke, Dylon
as 3:2019cv00935
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Petitioner:
Mickale Alonso Hicks
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. McCellster et al
as 2:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
Larry J Brown
Defendant:
P McCellster , CO Bolduan, CO Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
