Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Hughes v. Bobby Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Harris County, Fort Bend County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant:
Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. Fuller
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Hugh Alexander Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Martinez et al
as 6:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reese
Defendant:
Annette Martinez, Jodi Sawyer, T. Matz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Fagan
as 4:2024cv00741
Petitioner:
Darren Tremell Hughes
Respondent:
Sheriff Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coffman v. Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit, Warden Gene Miller, James M. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Pina
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, FNU Lane and FNU Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
