Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Martinez-Pujol v. Humphrey
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Yetmis Martinez-Pujol
Respondent:
C Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Humphrey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphrey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilbert v. Abbott et al
as 6:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Wilbert
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00025
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilbert v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Wilbert
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, Governor Greg Abbott, Governors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Brison Keith Humphrey
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Humphrey, et al
as 4:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hill
Defendant:
Texas State, Charlie Humphrey, Diana Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kwaylon Demaris Williams
Defendant:
Vincent A. Allen, Bryan Williams, A. Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbert v. Mt. View Unit et al
as 6:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Wilbert
Defendant:
Mt. View Unit, TDCJ, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
