Cases 1 - 10 of 594
Watson v. Wilhelm et al
as 1:2024cv06826
Defendant:
Tiam Clarke, Daniel J Wadoloski, Isaac Maysonet and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. TDCJ-ID
as 2:2024cv00635
Respondent:
TDCJ-ID
Petitioner:
Jamel De'Shon Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carr v. TDCJ-ID
as 2:2024cv00626
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID
Petitioner:
Willie Tyrone Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. TDCJ-ID et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Reginald Jones
Defendant:
State of Texas and TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. TDCJ-ID et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Reginald Jones
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of Rochester, NY RPD et al
as 6:2024cv06355
Defendant:
Officer D. Schultz, Officer ID# ROC 1847 and City of Rochester, NY RPD
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Defendant:
Correctional Officer S. Woleslage, Investigator Lorraine Salas, Director Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Canales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diomande v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03509
Plaintiff:
Kassia Diomande
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York Police Officer, John Doe, Unknown Tax ID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID et al
as 5:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID, Directors Review Committee and M.S.C.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
