Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Smith v. NetSpend Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Prentis Earl Smith, II
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation and Netspend Legal Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Simmons, II v. Bolarinwa et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Robert N Simmons, II
Defendant:
Olamide Bolarinwa, Sargent yet to be indentified, J Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakos v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drakos v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Freeman v. Bowers et al
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Berry Raydell Freeman
Defendant:
Rodger E. Bowers, Dustin T Wanders, Christopher N. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansolo v. Lumkin et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mansolo
Defendant:
Director TDCJ Bobby Lumkin, Captain Roy E. White, Gabrielle T. Villereal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakos v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Melissa Morris and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmett v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice Director
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Barry Patrick Emmett, II
Defendant:
Texas Board of Criminal Justice Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madden v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Joseph Benjamin Madden, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
