Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Stark, Jr. v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 3:2024cv50236
Petitioner: Ivan J. Stark, Jr.
Respondent: Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Rohlfing et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03939
Plaintiff: Ivan Jones
Defendant: Neal Rohlfing, Kyle Koester, Austin Crimm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Pustul et al
as 1:2023cv02933
Plaintiff: Ivan Ariel Davila
Defendant: K Pustul and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guyton v. Martino et al
as 1:2022cv03598
Plaintiff: Kendall Guyton
Defendant: Ivan Martino, Raul Maldonado, Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guyton v. Martino et al
as 2:2022cv02139
Plaintiff: Kendall Guyton
Defendant: Ivan Martino, Raul Maldonado, Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv02660
Plaintiff: Ivan Tabe Miller, Jr.
Defendant: City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Director of Psychology MCC Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv03556
Plaintiff: Ivan Parker
Defendant: Warden of MCC Chicago, Director of Psychology MCC Chicago and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv01226
Plaintiff: Rayvon Parker
Defendant: Ivan Madrigal, Ismael Alvarado, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Kolitwenzew
as 3:2020cv03178
Respondent: Chad Kolitwenzew
Petitioner: Ivan J Walton
Interested Party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walton v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2020cv02130
Respondent: Chad Kolitwenzew
Petitioner: Ivan J Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?