Cases 1 - 10 of 61
California Coalition for Women Prisoners et al v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv04155
Plaintiff:
California Coalition for Women Prisoners, R. B., A. H. R. and others
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden Thahesha Jusino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solomon J. M. Andrews v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2023cv02764
Plaintiff:
Solomon J. M. Andrews, Sr. and Solomual Andewsal
Defendant:
Lee Baca and 1-30
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Terial Love v. J. M. Robertson
as 2:2022cv00977
Petitioner:
Andre Terial Love
Respondent:
J M Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Wiltse v. Covello et al
as 2:2021cv00901
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, T. Coker, A. De Angelo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Wiltse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Robertson
as 3:2019cv08057
Respondent:
J. M. Robertson
Petitioner:
William Lloyd Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Lewis et al
as 2:2017cv02002
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wayne Jones
Defendant:
J. Lewis, M. Swain, B. Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marceleno v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation et al
as 1:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
Erik Abelino Marceleno
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation and J. M. Mora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric McCloskey v. J. M. Solorzano et al
as 5:2017cv00045
Defendant:
Nurse. Gonzalez, D. Nielson, J. Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Eric McCloskey
J.M. Godfrey v. Correctional Administration Pelican Bay State Prison et al
as 5:2016cv03630
Plaintiff:
J. M. Godfrey
Defendant:
G. W. Olson and Ducart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adolfo J M Barahona v. Raymond Madden
as 5:2015cv00785
Petitioner:
Adolfo J M Barahona
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
